Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Monitoring Kinerja Program Studi Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard Studi Kasus: Prodi Di Fakultas Teknik UKDC
Abstract
The activity of implementing the performance evaluation of study programs in tertiary institutions aims to improve internal quality in a sustainable manner. The performance evaluation process requires a gradual process, namely the performance monitoring process. Evaluation and monitoring of study program performance are generally implemented in the implementation of education, research, and community service to improve study program performance. Therefore, the priority of the main performance indicators of study programs in the Faculty of Engineering is determined by referring to the Chancellor's Regulation No. 03/PR/2022, classifies the main performance indicators of the Faculty of Engineering study program based on the dimensions of the balanced scorecard, and designs a work program monitoring spreadsheet to support KPI achievement. The research also aims to identify KPIs in four stages: customer perspective, financial perspective, business process perspective, and learning and growth perspective. The University has prioritized the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 7th performance indicators. Regulation of the Dean of the Faculty of Engineering No. 143/UKDC.1/A.01/XI/2022 as a reference in setting KPIs, this document has succeeded in formulating 22 main performance indicators and 5 additional performance indicators. Prioritized performance indicators are then made into a spreadsheet-based performance form which is useful in implementing performance monitoring
References
Anggraini, N., Rhamadoni, F., & Hasymi, I. D. (2020). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Anggaran Pendapatan Belanja Daerah Pemerintahan Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Public Administration Journal (PAJ), 4(1), 54-68.
Djunaidi, M., Alghofari, A. K., & Rahayu, D. A. (2006). Penilaian kualitas jasa pelayanan lembaga bimbingan belajar primagama berdasarkan preferensi konsumen. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 5(1), 25-32.
Fauzi, A., & Radiono, Y. (2011). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Fisika Dasar I Berbasis Spreadsheet dengan Pendekatan Analitik dan Numerik. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1.
Green. 2012. Indikator Kinerja Utama (Terjemahan Moeheriono). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
Harumantaka, D. S., Fahmi, I., & Maulana, A. (2019). Perancangan sistem Pengukuran Kinerja dengan metode balanced scorecard (Studi kasus BUMD ABC Kota Bogor). Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen (JABM), 5(3), 541-541.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2007). Balanced scorecard (pp. 137-148). Gabler.
Peraturan Dekan Fakultas Teknik no 143 /UKDC.1/A.01/XI/2022 TentangVisi, Misi Dan Rencana Strategi Fakultas Teknik Universitas katolik darma Cendika
Peraturan Rektor No. 01/PR/2022 tentang Visi, Misi, dan Rencana Strategis UKDC tahun 2022-2026 Universitas Katolik Darma Cendika
Permana, I. A. (2020). Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode Balance Scorecard (Studi Kasus Stt Sangkakala). Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 13(2), 89-99.
Rangkuti, F. (2004). The power of brands. Gramedia pustaka utama.
Ulfa, M., & Ridwan, M. (2015). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Metode Human Resources Scorecard Di BMT Logam Mulia. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 3(2), 311-339.
